Hangartner v city of seattle

Author: xcpl

August undefined, 2024

WebMar 13, 2005 · The feud erupted last spring, when a sharply divided state Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that city of Seattle officials could use attorney-client privilege to withhold … http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/166wn2d/166wn2d0747.htm

LLC v. CITY OF SPOKANE (2005) FindLaw

WebRick HANGARTNER Respondent, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Appellant. Citizens Against the Monorail, a political action committee registered with the … WebAug 27, 2015 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash.2d 439, 448, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). The onus is instead on the agency—necessarily through its employees—to perform “an adequate search” for the records requested. Neigh. All., 172 Wash.2d at 720–21, 261 P.3d 119. To satisfy the agency's burden to show it conducted an adequate search for … 50嵐飲料目錄2022

Supreme Court ruling limits access in

WebHangartner: vs. City of Seattle: Number: 151. Wn.2d 439, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) Year: 2004: State: Washington: Court: Washington State Supreme Court: Other lawsuits in … WebAug 11, 2005 · Shelley Marie Hall, Stokes Lawrence, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae (Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington, Inc.) ¶ 1 This case arises under the public disclosure act (PDA), chapter 42.17 RCW. WebOct 19, 2015 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 447, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). In determining whether a purported request provided the target agency sufficient notice that it was a records request, we look to the information included on … 50工人加工零件

Wa St Supreme Court Oral Arguments - TVW

WebOct 26, 2009 · Mechling appeals the trial court's decision that personal e-mail addresses of the council members in e-mails discussing city business are exempt from disclosure under the personal information exemption of the Public Disclosure Act (PDA), former RCW 42.17.310 (1) (u) (2005). 1 Mechling also contends the trial court erred in ruling that the … WebSee Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d at 453 (holding that RCW 5.60.060(2)(a), protecting attorney client communication, is an "other statute" under the PRA.) Nor does an "other statute" need to expressly mention the PRA or … 50嵐飲料熱量表WebOct 31, 2016 · The Washington Supreme Court in Hangartner v. City of Seattle (2004) ruled that RCW 5.60.060(2), the statute codifying the common law attorney-client privilege, is an “other statute” discharge under RCW 42.56.070(1). Accordingly, records or portions of records covered by the attorney-client privilege are exempt under the PRI. 50川

"WebJun 22, 1998 · Because the City waited until after he filed this lawsuit to comply with that request, Bonamy argues that his claims against the City should not have been … " - Hangartner v city of seattle

Hangartner v city of seattle

WebHangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 447-48, 90 P.3d 26 (2004). "[A] party seeking documents must, at a minimum [ ( 1 ) ] provide notice that the request is made … Web442 Hangartner v. City of Seattle May 2004 151 Wn.2d 439. James A. Andersen, Alison P. Howard, Michele L. Earl-Hubbard, and Eric B. Martin on behalf of Allied Daily …

Did you know?

WebAug 27, 2015 · Supreme Court of Washington,En Banc. Glenda NISSEN, an individual, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a public agency, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, a public agency, and Prosecutor Mark Lindquist, Petitioners. No. 90875–3. Decided: August 27, 2015 WebMay 20, 2004 · Washington’s Public Disclosure Act was amended in 1987 to restrict the exemptions of the Act. According to Aaron Hugh Caplan, an American Civil Liberties …

WebMar 7, 2005 · Likewise, in Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash.2d 439, 90 P.3d 26, 28 (2004), the Washington Supreme Court held improper a request for “all books, records, [and] documents of every kind” related to a specific public transportation project. WebNast v. Michels was a case before the Washington State Supreme Court in 1986 concerning a ... ACLU v. City of Seattle: 2009 Brouillet v. Cowles Publishing: 1990 City of Federal Way v. Koenig: 2009 Cowles Publishing Co. v. Murphy: 1981 Hangartner v. City of Seattle: 2004 Harold Carey v. Mason County: 2009 Hearst Corp. v. Hoppe: 1978 Laborers Int ...

WebMay 31, 2024 · LYFT, INC. and Rasier, LLC, Respondents, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Appellant, and Jeff Kirk, Defendant. Michael K. Ryan, Sara O'Connor-Kriss, Seattle City Attorney's Office, 701 5th Ave. Ste. 2050, Seattle, WA, 98104-7095, Matthew J. Segal, Kymberly Kathryn Evanson, Pacifica Law Group LLP, 1191 2nd Ave. Ste. 2000, Seattle, … Web90 P.3d 26 - HANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. 90 P.3d 37 - PARKLAND LIGHT & WATER CO. v. TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH, ... 90 P.3d 1116 - DeTRAY v. CITY OF OLYMPIA, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. 90 P.3d 1123 - McANDREWS GROUP, LTD., INC. v. EHMKE, ...

http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/151wn2d/151wn2d0439.htm

WebHANGARTNER v. CITY OF SEATTLE Email Print Comments (0) No. 73930-7. View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Listed below are those cases in which … 50巡音順WebOct 21, 2003 · Rick Hangartner, v. City of Seattle Aaron Caplan/Duncan Manville Edwin Inkley Roger Wynne/Shelley Pellegrino Mary Johnson SYNOPSIS: The Public … 50工作日WebRichard Germeau, Appellant V. Mason County, Et Al, Respondents :: 2012 :: Washington Court of Appeals, Division II Decisions :: Washington Case Law :: Washington Law :: US Law :: Justia 50工字钢每米重量WebAug 2, 2024 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash.2d 439, 447, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (citing Wood v. Lowe, 102 Wash. App. 872, 878, 10 P.3d 494 (2000) ). Agencies are not required to read minds. ... Rufin v. City of Seattle, 199 Wash. App. 348, 363, 398 P.3d 1237 (2024). While the PRA defines costs to include attorney fees, it only allows costs (and … 50巡航WebCity of Seattle, 151 Wash. 2d 439 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wash. 2d 439 – CourtListener.com 50州州都Web90 P.3d 26 151 Wash.2d 439. Rick HANGARTNER Respondent, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Appellant. Citizens Against the Monorail, a political action committee registered with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, Respondent, 50工字钢一米多少公斤WebJun 9, 2009 · Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 452, 90 P.3d 26 (2004) (quoting Kammerer v. W. Gear Corp., 96 Wn.2d 416, 421, 635 P.2d 708 (1981)); RCW … 50工字钢规格型号尺寸